Brass: Birmingham vs Brass: Lancashire

A side-by-side comparison of two of the most-asked-about board games — using only verified specs from our catalogue. No invented rules, no fluff.

Specs and BoardGameGeek rankings current as of June 2026. Gaps in our data show as a dash (—).

Brass: Birmingham Brass: Lancashire
Year20182007
Players2–42–4
Playtime~60 min~60 min
Recommended age14+14+
Complexity (BGG weight)3.9 / 53.8 / 5
BGG rank#1#22
DesignersGavan Brown, Matt Tolman, Martin WallaceMartin Wallace
Key mechanicsChaining, End Game Bonuses, Hand Management, IncomeChaining, End Game Bonuses, Hand Management, Income

Both games share these mechanics: Chaining, End Game Bonuses, Hand Management, Income, Loans, Market, Multi-Use Cards, Network and Route Building, Ownership, Tags, Tech Trees / Tech Tracks, Tile Placement, Turn Order: Stat-Based, Variable Set-up.

Which should you get?

Based only on the specs above — not on opinion:

  • Both sit at a similar weight (3.9 and 3.8 of 5 on BoardGameGeek), so neither is the obvious 'lighter' pick.
  • On raw BoardGameGeek ranking, Brass: Birmingham currently sits higher (#1 vs #22).

Both are well-loved games; the "right" one depends on your group. Read the full entries for Brass: Birmingham and Brass: Lancashire.

Where to buy

Amazon links are affiliate search links. As an Amazon Associate, EveryGameMade earns from qualifying purchases.

Common questions

Is Brass: Birmingham or Brass: Lancashire harder to learn?

They're close: Brass: Birmingham is rated 3.9 of 5 and Brass: Lancashire 3.8 of 5 on BoardGameGeek, so both are a similar level to learn.

Which is faster to play, Brass: Birmingham or Brass: Lancashire?

Both take about 60 minutes.

How many players do Brass: Birmingham and Brass: Lancashire support?

Brass: Birmingham plays with 2–4 players; Brass: Lancashire plays with 2–4 players.